For those of you who do not live in Michigan, or keep up on its politics, it may come as a surprise to find out that our economy is pretty much in the gutter. Our unemployment rate is the highest it has been in nearly six months, and it seems the bad news keeps rolling in. With large cuts in the automotive industry, coupled with the dissapearence of jobs from such powerhouses as Pfizer and Visteon, the future for Michigan looks bleak at best… or does it?

Michigan Governor Jennifer Granholm has some progressive ideas about how to get Michigan economy back on track. Recently returning from a brief stint in Sweden and other Scandinavian contries, Granholm reiterated her commitment to making Michigan a green state. Going above and beyond the usual ecopolitical jargon about how Michigan should be harnessing wind and hydroelectric power, Granholm went straight for the gold and put things into a perspective that matters most to the people of Michigan right now: economics.

Citing the creation of a new economy for Michigan, Granholm discussed her plans to compensate for the lagging automotive industry by strengthening Michigan’s alternative energy sector. She also made sure to note that she was working very hard to attract outside investments to increase the rate at which the sector can feasibly grow.

A good example of her commitment seemingly coming to fruition is the Memorandum of Understanding that was recently signed by a Swedish company, Chemrec AB, and NewPage Corporation, an Ohio-based business with mills and factories in Michigan. The memorandum outlines each company’s commitment to working together to develop plants in Michigan that would produce renewable biomass-based fuels in Escanaba, Michigan. According to Governor Granholm,

This partnership between Chemrec and NewPage is a great opportunity for us as we work to make Michigan the North American hub for alternative energy production…With its potential for biomass-based fuel production, this plant in Escanaba could put Michigan at the forefront of renewable next-generation fuels, helping to end our dependence on foreign oil while bringing jobs and investments to the community.

But not everyone in Michigan sees Governor Granholm’s vision as positively as she does. As Leah Burcat, writer for the Michigan Land Use Institute states, "Governor Jennifer M. Granholm’s efforts to make Michigan the ‘alternative energy epicenter of America’ is yielding some progress, but not nearly enough to keep Michigan competitive with other states, according to energy experts, academics, and government officials in and out of Michigan." In her article "Michigan’s ‘Energy Epicenter’ Turing Black, Not Green," Burcat discusses what many in Michigan believe to be Granholm’s biggest hurdle: the coal industry. Burcat goes on to explain that,

Many of [these] same experts and officials interviewed by the Great Lakes Bulletin News Service also pointed out that the two-term Democratic governor chooses not to talk about a very different, more potent trend taking shape in the state’s energy markets: The proliferation of new proposals to build coal-burning power plants, the dirtiest way to manufacture electricity… Citizens are already battling proposals for multi-billion dollar coal plants in Rogers City and Midland because such facilities cause acid rain, smog, mercury pollution, and contribute heavily to global warming.

So, the question many Michiganders have for Governor Granholm is, "Has your pledge to ‘go anywhere and do anything’ for jobs led us down a contrarian’s path? Are we preaching one thing, and doing the opposite behind the closed doors of big business?" As Burcat puts it, "The question… is whether that pledge should include using 19th-century boiler technology and an 18th-century fuel source to power a 21st century economy-and whether that will do nearly as much for Michigan as conserving energy and developing cleaner sources of electricity?"

With all potential hypocrisy aside, let just say for a minute that the alternative energy sector really was on the verge of taking off. Who would be qualified to work for these companies? See, the job diversity in Michigan is not what it is in other states- we have a very heavy concentration of workers, especially those over the age of 40, whose professional specialization lies somewhere within the production of cars or trucks. Therefore, to "boost the alternative energy sector" will mean much more than attracting new alternative energy companies; it will entail the retraining of nearly an entire section of our workforce, and that just covers the short-term.

In the long run, Michigan will need to adapt all aspects of its economy that funnel people into working for the automotive industry. Maybe this will mean modifying high school shop programs to include lessons on maintaining a wind turbine, or maybe it will require the creation of trade schools whose entire focus is various careers in the alternative energy sector.

Either way, training programs and specialty schools will both help to create a pertinently educated workforce and, in doing so, create a strong base for the expansion of the alternative energy sector. Yet, that leads us to the question of whether we run the possibility of educating these people just to have them leave for more desirable state economies. I don’t think so. I think that an educated workforce, along with an honest commitment to the alternative energy sector will give Michigan the help in needs to overcome the economic slump that is currently keeping us from being the economic powerhouse we once were.